Welcoming the spring is a discourse quite familiar to all of us. Yet, its significations are still much too ambiguous and grand. We don’t know if welcoming the spring is simply an act as it is, or a parody. Probably, welcoming the spring is merely just to face the spring, to return the words to what they merely are, to their ontology if there is one. The degree-zero of words, however, escapes language perpetually. We strive to arrive at that space before significations but could only obtain interpretations and meanings. To welcome the spring, therefore, is neither symbolic nor its complete opposite. It is a performance, within which we face the perpetual doubts turned against interpretations but couldn’t help but falling back to symbols and meanings.
To welcome the spring is therefore a perpetual action. The duration of art resists the discontinuity of historical narratives. How to understand the choices we face in the past 40 years? What keeps changing is changing itself. At the end of the 20th century, Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri’s Empire describes the birth of new sovereignty. The dialectics of globalization and localization collapse as hybridity keeps emerging. Yet, simply describing globalization as the emergence of hybridity still cannot describe where we really are. In other words, to use Bruno Latour’s words, “The modern Constitution has collapsed under its own weight.” We are, therefore, sometimes no longer facing the framework of the “West” and the “East”. Rather, we are facing the void of its collapse. Likewise, we are no longer facing the temporality of modernity and its counterpart pre-modernity. Rather, what arises as the issue is how modernity as a constitutional framework (in terms of language, socio-economic, historical, and temporal) collapses. What painting responds to is not often these apparent debates. However, this does not mean that painting exists outside of debates, outside of change, outside of history. Painting dwells humbly on the limits of language and history. It does not celebrate itself. Yet, with the emergence of each wave of change, it enriches itself.
What is most important, however, is the wish for physical gatherings. Group exhibitions present the convergence of different artistic experiences. Therefore, group exhibition provides the chance to pause and reflect on our commonality as well as singularity. Historical depth indeed grants the exhibition a physical and temporal distance from the audience, but it does not hinder us from recognizing singularities within the scope of our common experience. In this exhibition, we encounter both interconnectedness as well as differences, which collectively contribute to the duration of art’s vitality—there are, in a word, differences as well as repetitions. Like what the rivers in spring often realistically and metaphorically signify, they keep moving but do not yet know where they are heading towards.
Location: Beijing, China
Date: March, 2021